Skip to content

We Have A Solution To Global Climate Change: A Reasonable Proposal

Despite the virus scare (or perhaps because of it?), global warming alarmists still worry about and grieve over their pet cause. I’ve given the matter some serious thought and conclude that the only possible solution is population culling.

We need to cull 6.9 billion of the Earth’s 7.0 billion people and spread the survivors out over several habitable landmasses.  That would be 100 million people spread out over the vast plains of the U.S. and Canada and Mexico, the huge Brazilian and Argentine and Uruguayan and Venezuelan llanos, the gargantuan Asian steppes, the endless African savannas, the entire continent of Australia, and the flatlands of Europe.  Those 100 million humans would live maybe one person per 100 square miles.

"*" indicates required fields

Will you be voting in the upcoming midterm election?*
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

That should take care of social distancing.

We would have to diversify the cull to ensure equitable slaughters culling by race, birth sex, self-identified gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity, language group, handedness, height, weight, eye color, hair color, body mass type, number of fingers and toes, expected longevity, fingerprint type, toenail fungus vulnerability, etc.  Also, a fair spread of mechanics, welders, professors, farmers, talk show hosts, hairdressers, soldier types, stockbrokers, particle physicists, accountants, thieves, murderers, con men, politicians, and the like.

Yes, I repeat myself, but we mustn’t discriminate.

If that doesn’t cut the CO2 threat enough, we could cull all the cattle-type animals (cattle, deer, bison, etc.) whose whole purpose is to be dinner for other species.  Those cutbacks alone would reduce the number of predators breathing and farting and belching and in other ways emitting the dreaded CO2 — cutting it off at the source, so to speak.

As a result of such culling, the few people left would have an idyllic existence.  Clean air.  Clean water. No automobiles because of no gasoline. No air conditioning because it’s uneconomical to produce with so few people. No heating because there’d be no coal mining. No airplanes because they produce CO2.

You wouldn’t be around to enjoy it, but neither would your mother-in-law.  So there’s that.

By Jack Rail

Jack Rail is a retired Army officer who writes mostly when something gets his goat.

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

6 thoughts on “We Have A Solution To Global Climate Change: A Reasonable Proposal”

  1. people who believe this AGW tripe are exhibiting their low IQ level. If you do the math you find that human contribution is below the noise threshold of the data, therefore you cannot determine what all contributes to the noise in the data, or what percentage is human.

    Science facts: CO2 is about 3.5% of the Satanic Gases; humans contribute about 3% of the CO2 and Mother Nature the rest. If CO2 is going to raise the temperature some 4 degrees above pre-industrial levels then if we wiped out every human on the planet we would avoid 3.5% times 3% of that, or about 0.042 degrees. I’m not sure we could actually accurately detect that amount.

    In point of fact the data shows that CO2 increases some 80 to 800 years AFTER the global temperature rises. Rising CO2 is a result not a cause. It is Henry’s law (and others) about dissolved gases in a liquid that clearly show the oceans as source and sink for CO2 (and other atmospheric gases).

  2. Just so we are all on the same page as far as CO2 goes. Current percentage of CO2 that makes up the total atmosphere is four one hundreds of one percent (0.04%). It is a trace gas that is incapable of changing the weather.

  3. CO2 The Building Block of Life!
    Earth’s climate has been changing for at least four billion years in cycles large and small. Few in the climate debate understand those changes and their causes. Many are fixated on carbon dioxide (CO2), a minor constituent of the atmosphere, but one absolutely necessary for life as we know it. (In the process of photosynthesis, terrestrial plants, and phytoplankton, kelp, and algal plankton in the oceans use sunlight, carbon dioxide, and water to produce carbohydrates and oxygen.) Perhaps this fixation derives from ulterior political motives for controlling the global economy. For others, the true believers, perhaps this fixation derives from ignorance.

  4. The Culling started in 2020 when the CCP released a Biological Weapon on The World! Covid-19.
    The new strains were included. The Population of of The World is witnessing the systematic De-Population of The Earth…until the survivors are living in The New Stone Age!?

  5. Excellent suggestion, but it doesn’t go far enough. Critical analysis reveals that every species contributes to environmental degradation to some degree, so we shouldn’t limit our culling to humans: We should cull all life across the board! Think how glorious it would be to turn the clock back to the 4th day of Creation. It’s the only environmentally responsible solution to the out-of-control infestation of life on the Earth.

Comments are closed.