Will The Supreme Court Side With Individual Liberty?

I hate asking the question, but nothing is guaranteed anymore. The fact that there are more Republican-appointed justices than not bodes well for inherent rights and freedom in 2022’s big cases, in particular the anon vaccine cases, but with Roberts the Squish and three neophyte Trump appointees coming into their own, anything is possible. As an interesting aside, the three surviving retired justices (O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter) all joined the ranks courtesy of Republican presidents and subsequently tilted leftward. Has any justice ever moved right? When it’s all said and done, the idea of an absolutely safe constitutional court is on par with the idea of an absolutely safe vaccine. 

 

It is, of course, ridiculous to even think that the Supreme Court would even come close to upholding the mandates. What legal argument could be made to support it? There simply isn’t one; likewise for arguing for the medical need. The attorneys arguing against the mandate could highlight, among other things, that the vaccines are not even vaccines, they are closer to therapies. At that point, then, it would behoove the court to consider why other available – and much more robustly tested and understood – therapies like off-label use of repurposed drugs wouldn’t be more deserving of a medical mandate if one ever had to be considered. 

 

On top of that, there is now a database from the largest experimental group in the history of mankind to show that the vaccines neither prevent illness, death, nor transmission. The most obvious question to ask of the sitting justices is in what world does a mandate for an injection make sense when it doesn’t work? If the original two-dose regimen failed, followed by a booster failure, all as the virus wanes in lethality anyways, then there is no medical argument for this unknown substance being formed into arms (and everywhere else that it migrates). Give the anemic legal and medical argument for unprecedented government intrusion and this case should be as one-sided as Penn swimming contests.

 

Of course, with cases like Dred Scott, Plessy, Roe, and so many others in its long history, the Supreme Court is clearly a well-intentioned but failure-prone body of fallible and misguidable human actors.

 

To be sure, the January 7th hearings on two vaccine mandate cases will not spell the absolute end of Covid hysteria. However, only one outcome will guarantee that it’s possible. If the court reaches a decision in favor of Biden’s mandates through penumbral reasoning or some other inventive legal procedure, it is hard to see American coming back from the abyss. Once set in stone that the federal government has the authority to demand of its citizenry any variety of unwanted hardship in order to secure employment and monetary compensation, as well as movement, the absence of any limiting principles forever dooms our future as free peoples.

 

 

On the other hand, the Court’s predicted siding with truth and justice, while not able to penetrate the millions of minds corrupted by mass psychosis, at least provides an avenue for liberty. Interestingly, it isn’t just the unvaccinated who stand to lose in this case. Countless millions of Americans who initially received the two-dose regimen (on the lie that it would work and on the salesmanship that they had to just “do their part”) want nothing to do with the prospect of future pokes. Even those that got a third round of juice are starting to ask themselves if the routine of bi- or tri-annual shots makes sense against the dual realization that they don’t work and that the current iteration of the virus doesn’t demand that most even need it. Each of these people stand to become just as unvaccinated as the original refuseniks with each new definitional rewrite. 

 

Assuming the case strikes down the mandates, an area of academic interest will be seeing which, if any, of the justices sides with government tyranny. Should that happen, how will the rest of their decision-making be viewed when it is clear their entire judicial philosophy has been corrupted by leftist postmodernist thought. It is almost impossible to see how any future ruling from the highest bench in the country could ever be considered based on the constitutionality of a case if any of the justices voted for Biden’s executive overreach. 

 

We won’t have to wonder for very long.

What would YOU do with the Filibuster?*
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


13 thoughts on “Will The Supreme Court Side With Individual Liberty?”

  1. Pingback: What We’re Reading: Dems’ J6 Fixation, Filibuster Follies, The End Of COVID Panic? . . . And More – Issues & Insights

  2. The way I see it is, if the SCOTUS votes to allow a mandate requiring the country’s citizens be inoculated with an experimental medical mixture of whatever they are evil. If they do what is right and just and vote unanimously against, they may earn back some of their credibility. This decision will be paramount to our future. I hope they are not evil.

  3. I like the angle here in her article; that the vote of the justices will give us a gauge to judge them. When the law of the land is interpreted as denying God-given rights of personal freedom, it’s our most convincing indication of the rejection of God, the Constitution and any pretense of a republic. We need to know where we stand.

  4. Since Justice Roberts twice delivered Obamacare and Gay Marriage, I have no faith the court will do anything to protect the traditional citizen of the United States.

  5. I anticipate the Supreme Court has been considered and already properly addressed by the globalists (those pulling the strings at the FED and BIS, and elsewhere) that are behind this criminal scam.

    Their USA component of the “plan” remains intact. The 2022 midterms can’t result in Republicans taking control of either chamber of Congress. The Supreme Court members have been shown the light, I’m sure.

    I told my friends that how the California recall ended up is how the 2022 and 2024 elections will end up. We shall see.

  6. Pingback: January 2022 Conservative Article Reference List | Fatherly Advice and Rants

  7. “Will The Supreme Court Side With Individual Liberty?” No…no it will not. If you haven’t figured it out…for whatever reason, the “Conservatives” on the SCOTUS are quite fickle. Roberts has gone over for good…the rest? Who knows why they betray Liberty and Justice? Perhaps the Left has something on them after all.

  8. The answer to the headline will unfortunately be no. The court is compromised and will do the bidding of their masters who want our liberties destroyed.

  9. America is at a point of no return if SCOTUS rules for the mandates. We now realize the plandemic is nothing but a huge power play by communist democrats. Wake up America PCR tests are worthless, cloth masks-worthless, drugs effective against covid-can’t be prescribed or are not available. Omicron is actually a blessing- a mild version to provide heard immunity–while we protect the most vunerable! To Biden, Fauci, NIH, CDC: You can’t stop the spread of the virus—-Stop Pretending You Can!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    1. In all the history books and other assorted sources I’ve read, I’ve always read that “communism” always comes from “Judaism”, not “Democrats”.

      What books are YOU reading? All mine say the “democrat” and “republican” parties (root word: PART (verb) to separate, to divide) are tools of division and control.

      I think one of us is reading the wrong books.

      I’m pretty sure it’s not me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.