Skip to content

The Progressives’ Nationalization Of US Energy: 1912 To Hillary Clinton

  • by

In 1912, the Republican Party split with Teddy Roosevelt creating the Bull & Moose Party which was labeled a liberal progressive radical party.   As a result, the republicans lost the election in 1912 with Taft and Roosevelt splitting the Republican voters, and Democrat Woodrow Wilson walking away with the election.  The Progressive Party continued with a hodge podge of democrats and republicans onboard – much like our current Republican base progressives which we now call RHINO’s!

By 1948, the Progressive Party had become fully left wing radical democrats.   It is the Party that Hillary Clinton identified as her ideology without defining what its values were in 2016.    FDR was the first radical Progressive:  The party sought racial desegregation, the establishment of a national health insurance system, an expansion of the welfare system, and the nationalization of the energy industry. 

By 1960, the Party was fully dissolved – candidates had faired horribly and elections were favoring democrats.   The Progressive Party of Henry Wallace was considered controversial due to the issue of communist influence. The party served as a safe haven for communists and anti-war liberals.  And history is repeating itself with blinders on…

The only aspect of the Progressives that has yet to be finalized would thus be ‘nationalizing energy’.   And the means?   Electric vehicles retrofit with automatic cutoff capability via social credit.   Or not…

When grids and oil companies are found to be insecure – the government would bail them out and take control.  Much the way the banking industry was purged on behalf of the Banking Cartel.   The Tech Industry taken over by the FBI.   And the CIA acting as the dark military for BIS.

Recently, Chevron was in talks with Venezuela’s president, Maduro, to make a deal for the resumption of oil production.   Included in those talks is Blinken – our resident in chief Progressive communist.   The ‘permission’ for Chevron to resume production in Venezuela came from the US government.   Meaning ‘sanctions’ have become a means for ‘nationalization’ of energy.   Once sanctions are imposed – energy effectively comes under the thumb of ‘the government’.

Oil production in the US hit 12 billion per day recently matching pre-Pandemic output in 2019.   Prices at the pump have fallen by 50% and the global price per barrel has fallen to $71.    So why did prices increase?  Why was there a fake shortage?

"*" indicates required fields

Are you voting in the midterm elections?*
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A TEST?

Why would the US continue to ramp up production while simultaneously mandating EV usage?   Why has Natural Gas production also been affected negatively?

The US the now the world’s largest producer of natural gas?   So why would rates increase by 100% in just one year?   

The Progressive response would be – Ukraine and Russia.  


But the reality is the US is and has been working diligently to snuff-out Russia’s market share for decades.    1.   To push Russia into a recession,  and 2.   To force countries formerly dependent on Russia gas to become dependent on US gas.   Which is significantly costlier due to transportation.

While the US produces 12 million b/d of oil, it exports nearly 9 million b/d – leaving Americans with just 25% of production.   And just in time for a bitter squeeze, the IEA has announced/demanded a reduction of 21% production in the US for 2023.   Why?   To hike prices.

How can the EIA determine the production levels of public/private companies?   Nationalization.

In 1973 Nixon created the Federal Energy Office to counter an OPEC embargo.  OPEC instituted the embargo/sanctions in response to the Israeli War.    The Act then created the Federal Energy Administration tasked with price fixing oil.    Then in 1977, Carter expanded on the nationalization of oil when he created the EIA – Energy Information  Association so as to eclipse full orbital power over “Energy”.

Carter was the first president to come to head with the OPEC oil Embargo and encourage the transition to ‘solar’.   In essence, Carter was thus the ‘tipping point’ to demonize the oil industry.   And in so doing – take control via “Progressive” government regulations, sanctions, and acts under which the entire energy industry was required to BOW.

We know the Media was absorbed by the Progressives, we know US Education was absorbed by the Progressives, and we know that our Health & Medical Care has been absorbed by the Progressives – so why wouldn’t we believe that EVERYTHING has already been absorbed?

The only way to unravel the web, is by the square inch.

Recently, after the Media primed us sufficiently that our electric grid was prone to potential cyber attacks – our electric grid is under attack!   And everyone will freeze this winter …   Just in time for the Tridemic to infect every mortal being on earth.   Oh wait, that was in the Superman Comicbook 70 years ago…

In Order To Control one must first create chaos from which submission is inevitable – and complacency thus thrives.   Civilizations have disappeared under complacency.   Nations disappeared.    Because people gave up.   Giving Up – is never an option…

By Helena

Perhaps I am a female version of Don Quixote, a free spirit, a bit off, a bit different, riding Rocinante and fighting windmills! What I know is the world we are witness to today is not a Cinderella fit for me – and yet there is only one way to get back in the saddle and ride.   Holding a bridle of Honor, Respect and Integrity. You can follow Helena’s blog here.